![]() |
Mohammad Shami has been among the wickets in overseas ODIs For India, but he has leaked 25 boundaries in 108 balls in the slog overs |
With just a year to go for the 2015 World Cup, India's performances in their last two ODI series have caused plenty of concern. On the tour to South Africa earlier this season, they were thrashed in two games and might well have lost the third as well if not for the weather; their three defeats in New Zealand have been by smaller margins, but that isn't any consolation for a team that started this tour as the No. 1 side in the world. India will go into the 2015 World Cup as the defending champions, but based on their recent record they'll not be favourites, especially because the tournament will be held in Australia and New Zealand.
Since their 2011 World Cup win, India's overall ODI record looks
impressive: 43 wins, 26 losses in 75 matches, for a win-loss ratio of
1.65, the best among all teams
during this period. However, their overall numbers hide their poor
record in Australia, New Zealand, England and South Africa during this
period. Despite the win in the Champions Trophy
in England last year - a tournament in which they achieved a clean 5-0
win-loss record - India's stats in these countries since 2011 is eight
wins and 12 losses, and a win-loss ratio of 0.66. Five teams, including
Sri Lanka, have a better win-loss ratio in these countries during this
period.
On the other hand, when not playing in those countries, India have been unstoppable, winning 35 and losing 14, easily the best win-loss ratio
among all teams. However, their record in Australia, New Zealand,
England and South Africa will worry them, given that they also don't
have too much time to set things right.
The table below shows that India's batting average drops to 32.65 when
playing in these four countries, from 40.79 everywhere else. However,
India's batting run rate is marginally higher in these four countries -
5.58 to 5.53. The bowlers, though, have struggled to keep the runs down,
conceding 5.67 runs per over in these countries, up from 5.22
everywhere else. When compared with other teams
who've played in these four countries during this period, India's
record is worse than all teams except West Indies, who've gone at 5.72 to the over.Matches | W/ L | Ratio | Bat ave/ RR | Bowl ave/ ER | |
In Aus, Eng, NZ, SA | 25 | 8/ 12 | 0.66 | 32.65/ 5.58 | 36.61/ 5.67 |
In other countries | 50 | 35/ 14 | 2.50 | 40.79/ 5.53 | 31.19/ 5.22 |
Team | Matches | Won | Lost | Ratio | |||||
England | 41 | 22 | 15 | 1.46 | |||||
New Zealand | 26 | 14 | 10 | 1.40 | |||||
Australia | 40 | 21 | 16 | 1.31 | |||||
South Africa | 34 | 17 | 14 | 1.21 | |||||
Sri Lanka | 30 | 13 | 15 | 0.86 | |||||
India | 25 | 8 | 12 | 0.66 | |||||
Pakistan | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0.57 | |||||
West Indies | 14 | 3 | 10 | 0.30 |
MS Dhoni has often complained about his lack of bowling options overseas
where the pitches are truer and don't offer much turn, and the numbers
below bear out his complaint. India's bowlers - both pace and spin -
have fared much worse in Australia, England, New Zealand and South
Africa than in other countries. In those four countries, the fast
bowlers have averaged almost 40 runs per wicket and six per over; in
other countries both their averages and the economy rates are better.
The wicket-taking ability of the spinners takes a major hit in these
countries - best illustrated by R Ashwin's recent struggles - as the
average goes up from 30 to 44. The lack of wickets usually means
opposition teams have more wickets in hand to go after the bowling in
the slog overs.
Type | Wickets | Average | Econ rate | Strike rate | ||
In Aus, Eng, NZ, SA | Pace | 92 | 39.48 | 5.88 | 40.2 | |
Spin | 55 | 44.16 | 5.21 | 50.8 | ||
In other countries | Pace | 184 | 34.90 | 5.41 | 38.7 | |
Spin | 180 | 30.06 | 4.78 | 37.6 |
Admittedly, spin bowling in those countries isn't an easy task, given
that pitches are usually true and don't turn much, but even so the stats
for Indian spinners are worse than those of any other team, both in
terms of averages and economy rates. Pakistan's spinners average almost
40, but they've conceded only 4.62 runs per over, compared with India's
5.21. England's spinners have conceded 5.06 per over - the only side
other than India to concede more than five - but they've averaged 35.18,
considerably better than India's 44.16. India's spinners have taken 55
wickets in 25 matches, but that's more a reflection of the number of
overs they've bowled per match: they've bowled about 19 per game, but
they haven't actually given the team control in terms of curbing the
runs or taking wickets.
Team | Matches | Wickets | Average | Econ rate | Strike rate |
Pakistan | 11 | 29 | 39.48 | 4.62 | 51.2 |
Australia | 40 | 45 | 42.13 | 4.76 | 53.0 |
New Zealand | 26 | 40 | 39.70 | 4.83 | 49.2 |
South Africa | 34 | 45 | 40.24 | 4.85 | 49.7 |
Sri Lanka | 30 | 46 | 43.82 | 4.89 | 53.6 |
West Indies | 14 | 22 | 41.22 | 4.96 | 49.8 |
England | 41 | 55 | 35.18 | 5.06 | 41.6 |
India | 25 | 55 | 44.16 | 5.21 | 50.8 |
If India's spinners have less-than-flattering stats abroad, then the fast bowlers aren't much better. When playing in Australia, New Zealand, England and South Africa, they've averaged 39.48 runs per wicket, and 5.88 per over. In both these parameters, only West Indies have done worse than India, averaging 43.09 per wicket and 5.93 per over. On the other hand, the best teams are way better than India: South Africa average 26.61 at an economy rate of 4.88; Australia average 28.36 at an economy rate of 4.99.
Whether it's operating with the new ball in conditions that offer
something to the quick bowlers, or bowling at the death when opposition
batsmen are in search of quick runs, India's pace attack has been
equally toothless. In the first ten overs, they've conceded, on average,
4.91 runs per over and almost 40 runs per wicket, worse than all teams
except West Indies. The best in class, South Africa, are streets ahead -
they average 28.65 per wicket, and 3.99 per over. In the last ten,
India's seam attack leak 8.33 runs per over and again share the bottom
place, this time with New Zealand, whose fast bowlers do significantly
worse at the end of the innings than they do at the start. India's pace
bowlers don't take too many wickets either at the death, averaging more
than 33 per wicket. The best in class, South Africa again, concede about
half the number of runs per wicket, and only 6.20 per over.
The last column in the tables below further illustrates the proclivity
of the Indian fast bowlers to ease pressure, by frequently conceding
boundaries. In the first ten overs, they concede a four or a six every
8.58 balls - the worst of the lot - while the best in class is
Australia's 11.61. In the last ten, they concede a four or a six every
6.51 balls, worse than all teams except New Zealand. The top teams in
this category - Sri Lanka, South Africa and Australia - make the
opposition batsmen wait more than 8.5 balls per boundary. Mohammad Shami
has been the worst offender in this category, conceding 25 fours or
sixes in 108 balls in the last ten overs, an average of one every 4.32
balls. His economy rate at the death is 9.88. Ishant Sharma has had his
share of forgettable spells at the end, but overall his slog-over stats
are better: an economy rate of 7.28, and a boundary every 7.64 balls.
Umesh Yadav is similar, with an economy rate of 7.27, and a boundary
every 6.60 balls.
Team | Inngs | Wickets | Average | Econ rate | Balls/4 or 6 |
South Africa | 33 | 44 | 28.65 | 3.99 | 10.58 |
Pakistan | 11 | 15 | 28.26 | 4.15 | 10.03 |
New Zealand | 26 | 36 | 29.02 | 4.24 | 10.04 |
Australia | 40 | 56 | 29.05 | 4.26 | 11.61 |
England | 39 | 55 | 30.32 | 4.31 | 10.70 |
Sri Lanka | 30 | 37 | 35.59 | 4.77 | 9.80 |
India | 25 | 30 | 39.36 | 4.91 | 8.58 |
West Indies | 14 | 15 | 40.73 | 4.91 | 8.78 |
Team | Inngs | Wickets | Average | Econ rate | Balls/ 4 or 6 |
South Africa | 25 | 49 | 17.59 | 6.20 | 8.60 |
Sri Lanka | 23 | 42 | 24.80 | 6.70 | 9.61 |
Australia | 27 | 63 | 22.34 | 6.94 | 8.82 |
England | 30 | 65 | 23.56 | 7.39 | 7.10 |
Pakistan | 9 | 10 | 26.60 | 7.86 | 6.15 |
West Indies | 9 | 12 | 35.08 | 8.09 | 6.64 |
India | 19 | 28 | 33.57 | 8.33 | 6.51 |
New Zealand | 18 | 32 | 26.00 | 8.33 | 5.65 |
And finally, a look at the Indian bowlers who've sent down more than 50
overs in these four countries during this period. Whichever way you look
at it, these numbers don't make for impressive reading. The bowlers
with reasonably good economy rates average more than 40 runs per wicket;
those who average less than 30 go at about six an over or more. Umesh
Yadav, who some experts reckon should be playing in the ODIs in New
Zealand, averages almost 60 runs per wicket and goes at a run a ball. No
wonder Dhoni has been wondering aloud about his bowling options for the
2015 World Cup.
Bowler | Overs | Wickets | Average | Econ rate | Strike rate |
Bhuvneshwar Kumar | 80 | 9 | 44.00 | 4.95 | 53.3 |
R Ashwin | 198 | 23 | 43.26 | 5.02 | 51.6 |
Ravindra Jadeja | 186.4 | 24 | 40.04 | 5.14 | 46.6 |
Praveen Kumar | 57 | 6 | 49.50 | 5.21 | 57.0 |
Vinay Kumar | 68.5 | 11 | 34.45 | 5.50 | 37.5 |
Ishant Sharma | 70 | 16 | 25.87 | 5.91 | 26.2 |
Umesh Yadav | 98.4 | 10 | 59.90 | 6.07 | 59.2 |
Mohammad Shami | 62 | 19 | 23.15 | 7.09 | 19.5 |
No comments:
Post a Comment